This presentation examines and evaluates the effectiveness of Family Dependency Treatment Courts in 6 major cities across the country.
This is an outcome and cost evaluation of a court.
This cost-benefit analysis examines the methodology for the study and the findings, as the third phase of a multi-faceted evaluation of San Bernardino County Redlands Drug Court program.
This is an outcome and cost evaluation of the Baltimore County Juvenile Drug Court that was published in January 2010.
Report examining the site-specific cost-benefit results for San Bernardino County’s Joshua Tree Drug Court.
This contains the Anne Arundel County (Circuit) Adult Drug Court Process Evaluation.
Topics: Community, Drug Testing, Eligibility Criteria, Entry, Evaluation, Family Involvement and Assessment, Fees, Goals, Graduation, Hearing, Incentives, Offenders, Overview, Participants, Performance Measurement and Evaluation, Phases, Process, Program, Program Costs, Program Descriptions, Program Procedures, Programs, Provider, Recomendations, Sanction, Screening, Substance Abuse, Team, Termination, Training, Treatment, Treatment Services
The report on the Prince George’s County Circuit Court Adult Drug Court (PGCADC) program investigated the cost of the program and the outcomes of participants as compared to a sample of similar individuals who received traditional court processing.
This report contains the process evaluation for the Prince George’s County Juvenile Drug Court (PGCJDC).
Topics: Abuse, Drug Testing, Eligibility, Eligibility Criteria, Evaluation, Family Involvement and Assessment, Fees, Funding, Goals, Goals and Objectives, Graduation, Incentives, Juvenile, Meeting, Phases, Program, Program Costs, Program Descriptions, Programs, Provider, Sanction, Screening, Screening and Assessment, Substance Abuse, Team, Team Roles and Responsibilities, Termination, Training, Treatment, Treatment Plans, Treatment Services
This PowerPoint is an evaluation of a study done on two Oregon counties’ family drug court programs.